首页> 外文OA文献 >Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 2
【2h】

Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 2

机译:出口拉动型增长:对经验文献的调查和一些非因果关系的结果。第2部分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper continues the investigation of Giles and Williams (2000) on export-led growth (ELG). In the first part, we surveyed the empirical export-led growth literature; it was evident that Granger non-causality tests are commonly applied as a test for ELG. In this paper, we explore the sensitivity of the test for exclusions restrictions often used as the Granger non-causality test for ELG by reconsidering two applications: Oxley's (1993) study for Portugal and Henriques and Sadorsky's (1996) analysis for Canada. We focus on the robustness of the method adopted to deal with non-stationarity, including the choice of deterministic trend degree. We show that different noncausality outcomes are easy to obtain, and consequently we recommend that readers interpret the empirical ELG literature with care. Our analysis also highlights the importance of examining the robustness of Granger non-causality test results to avoid spurious outcomes in applications.
机译:本文继续对Giles and Williams(2000)的出口导向型增长(ELG)进行调查。在第一部分中,我们调查了以出口为导向的经验性增长文献。显然,格兰杰非因果关系测试通常用作ELG测试。在本文中,我们通过重新考虑以下两个应用来探讨该排除测试的敏感性,该排除测试通常用作ELG的格兰杰非因果关系测试:Oxley(1993)在葡萄牙的研究以及Henriques和Sadorsky(1996)在加拿大的分析。我们关注于用于处理非平稳性的方法的鲁棒性,包括确定性趋势度的选择。我们表明,很容易获得不同的非因果结果,因此,我们建议读者谨慎地解释经验性ELG文献。我们的分析还强调了检查Granger非因果测试结果的稳健性以避免应用程序中虚假结果的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Judith Giles; Cara Williams;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号